4.7 Article

Effect of support nature on the cobalt-catalyzed CO2 hydrogenation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 562-571

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.08.019

关键词

CO2 hydrogenation; Methanation; Co-based catalysts

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [PCIN-2013-183]
  2. Spanish government [FPU13/00727]
  3. General Secretariat of Research and Technology of Greece [13CAPITA-13-8A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CO2 hydrogenation to value added chemicals/fuels has gained considerable interest, in terms of sustainable energy and environmental mitigation. In this regard, the present work aims to investigate the CO2 methanation performance of cobalt-based catalysts supported on different metal oxides (MxOy: CeO2, ZrO2, Gd2O3, ZnO) at low temperatures (200-300 degrees C) and under atmospheric pressure. Various characterization methods, such as N-2 adsorption-desorption at -196 degrees C, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and temperature-programmed reduction (TPR), were employed to correlate the structural and surface properties of the materials with their catalytic activity. The results revealed a significant impact of support nature on the CO2 hydrogenation performance. The following order, in terms of CH4 yield (YCH4), was recorded at 300 degrees C: Co/CeO2 (similar to 96%) > Co/ZnO (similar to 54%) > Co/G(2)O(3) (similar to 53%) similar to Co/ZrO2 (similar to 53%). On the basis of the characterization results, the superiority of Co/CeO2 catalyst can be mainly ascribed to its enhanced reducibility linked to Co-Ceria interactions. Moreover, Co/CeO2 demonstrated a stable conversion/selectivity performance under subsequent reaction cycles, in contrast to Co/ZnO, which progressively activated under reaction conditions. The latter is related with the modifications induced in elemental chemical states and surface composition of Co/ZnO upon pretreatment in reaction conditions, in contrast to Co/CeO2 sample where a stable surface performance was observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据