4.7 Article

Overcoming the equilibrium barriers of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol via water sorption: A thermodynamic analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 360-367

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.06.007

关键词

Sorption enhanced CO2 hydrogenation to methanol; In-situ water sorption; Thermodynamic analysis; Process simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a detailed thermodynamic analysis and simulation of an intensified process for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol with in-situ water sorption is presented. The study focused on the effect of different operating parameters, such as temperature, pressure, H-2/CO2 molar ratio and adsorbent volume capacity, on the reactor performance with the aim to define the optimum operating window. The analysis was also performed for the conventional process as benchmark. The continuous removal of H2O shifts the thermodynamic equilibrium and drives the reactions of CO2 to completion under the entire investigated parameter range. In temperatures and pressures of interest for practical application (220 degrees C-270 degrees C and 50-70 bar), the methanol yield is up to 130% higher in the sorption-enhanced process compared to direct hydrogenation. The only negative aspect was the decrease of CH3OH selectivity in favor of CO production. Despite this, the benefits of water sorption are indisputable and overcome the slight decrease in selectivity. The simulation of the complete process, including gas recycle, showed that with in-situ water removal 15% higher methanol productivity can be attained, with very high once-through CO2 conversion and CH3OH yield and very low gas recycle. This has important implications on the economics of the process, as it decreases the size of the reactor and the auxiliary equipment and practically eliminates the need for downstream methanol-water separation via distillation, leading to substantial process intensification and reduction of capital and operating costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据