4.7 Article

Development of barley and yeast β-glucan aerogels for drug delivery by supercritical fluids

期刊

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 262-269

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.10.006

关键词

beta-glucan; Acetylsalicylic acid; Aerogel; Rheology; Supercritical drying; Supercritical impregnation

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) from Fundacion General of the University of Valladolid [CTQ2013-44143-R, PIP 063/147181]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion, Ciencia y Deporte (MECD)
  3. MINECO
  4. UVa [JCI-2012-14992]
  5. European Union Seventh Framework Programme [REGPOT-CT2012-316331-POLARIS]
  6. project Novel smart and biomimetic materials for innovative regenerative medicine approaches [RL1 - ABMR - NORTE-01-0124-FEDER-000016]
  7. North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (ON.2-O Novo Norte), under National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF), through European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polysaccharide aerogels are a good alternative as carriers for drug delivery, since they allow high loading of the active compounds in matrices that are non-toxic, biocompatible and from a renewable feedstock. In this work, barley and yeast beta-glucans aerogels were produced by gelation in aqueous solution, followed by solvent exchange and drying with supercritical CO2. First, viscoelastic properties and melting profile of the hydrogels were determined. Then, the obtained aerogels were analyzed regarding morphology, mechanical properties and behavior in physiological fluid. Both in the hydrogels and in the aerogels, big differences were observed between barley and yeast beta-glucans due to their different chain structure and gelation behavior. Finally, impregnation of acetylsalicylic acid was performed at the same time as the drying of the alcogels with supercritical CO2. The release profile of the drug in PBS was analyzed in order to determine the mechanism governing the release from the beta-glucan matrix.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据