3.8 Proceedings Paper

Improved in vitro culture and multiplication of different Allium hirtifolium Bioss. ecotypes

期刊

出版社

INT SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1143.15

关键词

Allium hirtifolium; in vitro; ecotype; multiplication; plant growth regulator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Persian shallot (Allium hirtifolium), called as Mooseer in Iran belongs to Alliaceae family and is one of the important edible alliums in Iran. It is native to Iran and grows as a wild plant across the Zagross Mountains. Mooseer bulbs and seeds can be used in propagation, but the bulbs are very slow to grow and the seeds have deep dormancy. Taking into the nutraceuticals value of Persian shallot, it is necessary to improve the multiplication rate of Allium hirtifolium and prevent its extinction. Meanwhile in vitro culture technique can be used for large scale production of different species. In this study the responses of six ecotypes of Allium hirtifolium (Esfahan, Hamedan, Lorestan, Sardasht, Zanjan, Yasuj) collected from different climate in Iran, for in vitro shoot multiplication was investigated. Explants from basal plate were cultured in optimized medium for shoot induction composed of Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with 2 mg L-1 N6-benzyladenine (BA) and 1 mg L-1 Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). Shoots produced were then transferred to hormone free medium for root induction. Although shoot multiplication was obtained in all the ecotypes but results showed the significant variability of days to shoot induction, percent of shoot induction, shoot height, shoot number and percent of root induction in different ecotypes. Explants derived from Zanjan ecotype had the highest potential for regeneration, in which about 17.5 shoots were produced per each explants in 12 weeks culture and showed the highest root induction (80%). These developed plantlets would be open possibilities for domestication and creation of new genotypes which leads to preservation of this species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据