4.6 Article

Elevated Carbon Dioxide Alleviates Aluminum Toxicity by Decreasing Cell Wall Hemicellulose in Rice (Oryza sativa)

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00512

关键词

aluminum (Al) stress; cell wall; CO2; hemicellulose; nitric oxide (NO); root elongation

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB441000]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB15030302, XDB15030202]
  3. Field Frontier Program of the Institute of Soil Science [ISSASIP1601]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of China [31501825]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is involved in plant growth as well as plant responses to abiotic stresses; however, it remains unclear whether CO2 is involved in the response of rice (Oryza sativa) to aluminum (Al) toxicity. In the current study, we discovered that elevated CO2 (600 mu L center dot L-1) significantly alleviated Al-induced inhibition of root elongation that occurred in ambient CO2 (400 mu L center dot L-1). This protective effect was accompanied by a reduced Al accumulation in root apex. Al significantly induced citrate efflux and the expression of OsALS1, but elevated CO2 had no further effect. By contrast, elevated CO2 significantly decreased Al-induced accumulation of hemicellulose, as well as its Al retention. As a result, the amount of Al fixed in the cell wall was reduced, indicating an alleviation of Al induced damage to cell wall function. Furthermore, elevated CO2 decreased the Al-induced root nitric oxide (NO) accumulation, and the addition of the NO scavenger c-PTIO (2-(4-carboxypheny1)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxy1-3-oxide) abolished this alleviation effect, indicating that NO maybe involved in the CO2-alleviated Al toxicity. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the alleviation of Al toxicity in rice by elevated CO2 is mediated by decreasing hemicellulose content and the Al fixation in the cell wall, possibly via the NO pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据