4.1 Article

Testing the Effectiveness of Fundraiser Job Titles in Charitable Bequest and Complex Gift Planning

期刊

NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 165-179

出版社

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/nml.21231

关键词

fundraising; philanthropy; job titles; charitable bequest; planned giving

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional fundraiser job titles are often institution centered, focusing on the benefits of fundraising as institutional advancement or institutional development. Such institution-centered job titles may not be as effective with donors given the modern shift toward donor-centered philanthropy. Alternative job titles can be gift centered (for example, major gifts) or donor centered (for example, donor advising). A survey of 3,188 respondents tested sixty-three job titles in four charitable scenarios: a charitable bequest gift, a gift of stock, a gift of real estate, and a charitable gift annuity. Measured by which person donors would be more likely to contact to discuss each donation, the worst-performing titles were the traditional institution-focused fundraiser job titles, in particular those using advancement, institutional advancement, or development. This was also true when examining only respondents who had made large gifts ($500+) to a charity. Traditional institution-focused job titles are both the most commonly used and the worst performing. Nonprofit managers may do well to consider the donor's perspective when selecting job titles for fundraisers rather than following traditional industry practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据