4.3 Review

Malaria medicines to address drug resistance and support malaria elimination efforts

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 61-70

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1387773

关键词

Malaria; artemisinin resistance; containment efforts; global response; antimalarial drug resistance

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A900_1119] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MC_UP_A900_1119] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A900_1119] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Antimalarial drugs are essential weapons to fight malaria and have been used effectively since the 17th century. However, P. falciparum resistance has been reported to almost all available antimalarial drugs, including artemisinin derivatives, raising concerns that this could jeopardize malaria elimination. Areas covered: In this article, we present a historical perspective of antimalarial drug resistance, review current evidence of resistance to available antimalarial drugs and discuss possible mitigating strategies to address this challenge. Expert commentary: The historical approach to drug resistance has been to change the national treatment policy to an alternative treatment. However, alternatives to artemisinin-based combination treatment are currently extremely limited. Innovative approaches utilizing available schizonticidal drugs such as triple combination therapies or multiple first line treatments could delay the emergence and spread of drug resistance. Transmission blocking drugs like primaquine may play a key role if given to a substantial proportion of malaria infected persons. Deploying antimalarial medicines in mass drug administration or mass screening and treatment campaigns could also contribute to containment efforts by eliminating resistant parasites in some settings. Ultimately, response to drug resistance should also include further investment in the development of new antimalarial drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据