4.6 Article

Boron-doped reduced graphene oxide-based bimetallic Ni/Fe nanohybrids for the rapid dechlorination of trichloroethylene

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 565-576

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6en00575f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan [MOST 104-2221-E-009-020-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a simple chemical reduction method for the synthesis of novel and efficient graphene-based bimetallic Fe/Ni nanoparticles was developed for the rapid and effective dechlorination of trichloroethylene (TCE). Boron-doped reduced graphene oxide (B-rGO) was used as a support for the homogenous dispersion of Fe/Ni nanoparticles between the B-rGO nanosheets. The surface morphological results showed that the particle sizes of the bimetallic Fe/Ni nanoparticles were in the range of 10-50 nm with a mean diameter of 20 nm and the elements, including B, Fe and Ni, were homogenously distributed in the graphitic matrix. The Raman, X-ray photoelectron and electrochemical impedance spectra clearly indicated that the doped boron as well as the immobilized Fe/Ni increased the disordered structure of B-rGO. Conjointly, the interaction between the graphitic backbone and bimetallic nanoparticles resulted in fast and low-resistant electron transport in B-rGO/Fe/Ni for the enhanced dechlorination efficiency and rate of TCE. A rapid and complete hydrodechlorination of TCE by B-rGO/Fe/Ni, which followed the Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetics, was observed between pH 4 and 7. In addition, the B-rGO-immobilized Fe/Ni could retain the high reactivity after 7 cycles of repeated injection of TCE. The results obtained in this study clearly demonstrate the efficiency, longevity and recyclability of B-rGO-immobilized Fe/Ni nanoparticles, which could pave a new way to prepare novel bimetallic Fe/Ni nanoparticles with high reactivity and long stability for the removal of environmental contaminants in water purification and waste-water treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据