4.4 Article

Glypican-3 and KRT19 are markers associating with metastasis and poor prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

期刊

CANCER BIOMARKERS
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 397-404

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/CBM-160655

关键词

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; dysplasia; pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia; GPC3; KRT19; CA19-9; immunohistochemistry

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly malignant tumor with metastasis in most patients at diagnosis. The molecular mechanisms associated with its high malignancy have not been fully elucidated. This study investigated the clinicopathological significances of GPC3 and KRT19 expression in PDAC. METHODS: GPC3, KRT19, and CA19-9 protein expression were measured by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: GPC3 and KRT19 protein levels were overexpressed in PDAC tumors compared to normal pancreatic tissues, benign pancreatic tissues, and peritumoral tissues (P < 0.01). The percentage of positive GPC3 and KRT19 expression were significantly higher in PDAC patients with larger tumor size, poorly differentiated tumor, lymph node metastasis, invasion, and TNM stage III/IV disease than in patients with small tumor size, well-differentiated tumor, no lymph node metastasis and invasion, as well as TNM stage I/II stage disease (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Benign pancreatic lesions with positive GPC3 and KRT19 protein expression exhibited dysplasia or intraepithelial neoplasia. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that PDAC patients with positive GPC3 and KRT19 expression survived significantly shorter than patients with negative GPC3 and KRT19 expression (P < 0.05 or P < 0.001). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that positive GPC3 and KRT19 expression were independent poor prognosis factors in PDAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: GPC3 and KRT19 overexpression are associated with carcinogenesis, progression, and poor prognosis in patients with PDAC and a valuable biomarker for diagnosis of PDAC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据