4.5 Article

NiMn2O4 Nanosheet-Decorated Hierarchically Porous Polyaromatic Carbon Spheres for High-Performance Supercapacitors

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 1214-1221

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201700023

关键词

carbon spheres; hybrid; nickel manganese oxide; polyaromatics; porous materials; supercapacitors

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1D1A1A09057372]
  2. National Research Foundation [2016R1A2B4014710]
  3. Korean Government (MISP)
  4. BK21 PLUS Program
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1A2B4014710, 2015R1D1A1A09057372] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have designed and synthesized hierarchically porous and spherical carbons decorated with a nickel manganese oxide (NiMn2O4) and utilized them as a pseudocapacitor electrode. The polyanthracene (PAT)-based carbon materials were firstly synthesized by the self-polymerization of bromomethylated anthracene in the presence of zinc bromide as a catalyst and bromomethyl methyl ether as a crosslinker. The carbon materials with a 3D network were fabricated by direct carbonization and activation of the as-prepared PAT. The micro-, meso-, and macroporous 3D carbon materials are characterized by a large specific surface area, an electrolyte-electrode interface area, and a continuous electron transport path. To produce high-performance pseudocapacitor electrodes, NiMn2O4-decorated carbon hybrid materials (C@NiMn2O4) have also been synthesized by using a hydrothermal method. The C@NiMn2O4 composites exhibit a maximum specific capacitance of 470.7 Fg(-1) at a current density of 1 Ag-1, good rate capability of 74.6 %, and excellent capacitance retention of 89.6% at a current density of 10 Ag-1 following 5000 cycles. Based on these results, the electrode shows good potential for future supercapacitor applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据