4.6 Article

Reactor Design for CO2 Photo-Hydrogenation toward Solar Fuels under Ambient Temperature and Pressure

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/catal7020063

关键词

CO2 reduction; Pt/CuAlGaO4; photo-hydrogenation; photocatalysis; solar fuels

资金

  1. Chung-Shan Institute of Science & Technology, Taiwan [CSIST-808-V309(103)]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [NSC 103-2923-E-002-009-MY3]
  3. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [14-35327J]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photo-hydrogenation of carbon dioxide (CO2) is a green and promising technology and has received much attention recently. This technique could convert solar energy under ambient temperature and pressure into desirable and sustainable solar fuels, such as methanol (CH3OH), methane (CH4), and formic acid (HCOOH). It is worthwhile to mention that this direction can not only potentially depress atmospheric CO2, but also weaken dependence on fossil fuel. Herein, 1 wt % Pt/CuAlGaO4 photocatalyst was successfully synthesized and fully characterized by ultraviolet-visible light (UV-vis) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Field emission scanning electron microscopy using energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis (FE-SEM/EDS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), respectively. Three kinds of experimental photo-hydrogenation of CO2 in the gas phase, liquid phase, and gas-liquid phase, correspondingly, were conducted under different H-2 partial pressures. The remarkable result has been observed in the gas-liquid phase. Additionally, increasing the partial pressure of H-2 would enhance the yield of product. However, when an extra amount of H-2 is supplied, it might compete with CO2 for occupying the active sites, resulting in a negative effect on CO2 photo-hydrogenation. For liquid and gas-liquid phases, CH3OH is the major product. Maximum total hydrocarbons 8.302 mu molg(-1) is achieved in the gas-liquid phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据