4.5 Article

Olfaction in Parkin carriers in Chinese patients with Parkinson disease

期刊

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.680

关键词

gene; olfaction; Parkin; Parkinson disease; Sniffin' Sticks test

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571232, 81401048, 81371413]
  2. Ministry of Science and technology of China [2016YFC1306500]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [15ZR1435800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Olfactory identification was reported to be better among PD (Parkinson disease) patients with Parkin mutations, but previous studies didn't eliminate the interference of other PD related genes on olfaction, and whether olfaction of Parkin mutations patients was better in Chinese population was still unknown. Objective: To assess olfaction function among PD patients with Parkin mutations in Chinese population. Materials and Methods: A total of 226 PD patients with a positive family history or an early-onset age (< 50 years) were enrolled for genetic testing of PD related genes by target sequencing and multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification. The clinical data including olfactory function test were investigated. Linear regression was performed to adjust for the covariates between all groups. Results: There were 68 patients found having a negative result in PD genetic testing and 43 patients carrying homozygous or compound heterozygous Parkin mutations. Among them, 49 PD panel negative patients and 33 PD-Parkin patients had results of olfactory assessment. PD-Parkin patients performed significantly better on the Sniffin' Sticks tests than panel negative patients (8.0 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.7 +/- 1.9, p < .001), but still worse compared to healthy controls (9.4 +/- 1.5, p = .003). These differences persisted after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions: Among Chinese population, PD-Parkin patients had relatively preserved olfaction compared to PD panel negative patients after eliminating the interference of other PD related genes, but were still worse than healthy controls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据