4.0 Article

Puumala hantavirus infections in bank vole populations: host and virus dynamics in Central Europe

期刊

BMC ECOLOGY
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12898-017-0118-z

关键词

Myodes glareolus; Population dynamics; Puumala virus seroprevalence; Space use; Survival

类别

资金

  1. Federal Environment Agency (UBA) within the Environment Research Plan of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) [3709 41 401, 3713 48 401]
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the National Research Platform for Zoonoses (Network 'Rodent-borne pathogens') [01KI1018, 01KI1303]
  3. Robert Koch-Institut
  4. German Ministry of Public Health [1362/1-924, 1362/1-980]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SPP 1596, UL 405/1-1]
  6. EU [FP7-261504]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In Europe, bank voles (Myodes glareolus) are widely distributed and can transmit Puumala virus (PUUV) to humans, which causes a mild to moderate form of haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, called nephropathia epidemica. Uncovering the link between host and virus dynamics can help to prevent human PUUV infections in the future. Bank voles were live trapped three times a year in 2010-2013 in three woodland plots in each of four regions in Germany. Bank vole population density was estimated and blood samples collected to detect PUUV specific antibodies. Results: We demonstrated that fluctuation of PUUV seroprevalence is dependent not only on multi-annual but also on seasonal dynamics of rodent host abundance. Moreover, PUUV infection might affect host fitness, because seropositive individuals survived better from spring to summer than uninfected bank voles. Individual space use was independent of PUUV infections. Conclusions: Our study provides robust estimations of relevant patterns and processes of the dynamics of PUUV and its rodent host in Central Europe, which are highly important for the future development of predictive models for human hantavirus infection risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据