4.5 Article

Sex difference in thermal preference of adult mice does not depend on presence of the gonads

期刊

BIOLOGY OF SEX DIFFERENCES
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13293-017-0145-7

关键词

Sex; Gonadectomy; Estrogen; Progesterone; Testosterone; Thermosensing; Body temperature regulation; Thermogenesis; Nesting behavior; Dark-light cycle

资金

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  2. Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The thermoneutral zone (TNZ) is a species-specific range of ambient temperature (T-a), at which mammals can maintain a constant body temperature with the lowest metabolic rate. The TNZ for an adult mouse is between 26 and 34 degrees C. Interestingly, female mice prefer a higher Ta than male mice although the underlying mechanism for this sex difference is unknown. Here, we tested whether gonadal hormones are dominant factors controlling temperature preference in male and female mice. Methods: We performed a temperature preference test in which 10-week-old gonadectomized and sham-operated male and female C57BL/6J mice were allowed to choose to reside at the thermoneutral cage of 29 degrees C or an experimental cage of 26, 29, or 32 degrees C. Results: All mice preferred a Ta higher than 26 degrees C, especially in the inactive phase. Choosing between 29 and 32 degrees C, female mice resided more at 32 degrees C while male mice had no preference between the temperatures. Hence, the preferred T-a for female mice was significantly higher (0.9 +/- 0.2 degrees C) than that for male mice. However, gonadectomy did not influence the T-a preference. Conclusions: Female mice prefer a warmer environment than male mice, a difference not affected by gonadectomy. This suggests that thermal-sensing mechanisms may be influenced by sex-specific pathways other than gonadal factors or that the thermoregulatory set point has already been determined prior to puberty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据