4.5 Article

Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Placebo for Systemic Sclerosis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease An Analysis of Scleroderma Lung Studies I and II

期刊

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 69, 期 7, 页码 1451-1460

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.40114

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute) [R01-HL-089758, R01-HL-089901]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [through the University of California, Los Angeles] [UL1-TR-000124]
  3. Scleroderma Foundation
  4. EMD Serono
  5. Bayer
  6. Cytori
  7. EMD Serono (Merck)
  8. Forward
  9. Genentech/Roche (InterMune)
  10. Lycera
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  12. AbbVie
  13. Amgen
  14. Janssen
  15. Gilead
  16. GlaxoSmithKline
  17. NIH
  18. Novartis
  19. Pfizer
  20. Roche/Genentech
  21. UCB
  22. Actelion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To compare mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with placebo for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods. We included participants enrolled in the placebo arm of Scleroderma Lung Study (SLS) I and the MMF arm of SLS II. SLS I randomized participants to receive either oral cyclophosphamide (CYC) or placebo for 1 year, while SLS II randomized participants to receive either MMF for 2 years or oral CYC for 1 year followed by 1 year of placebo. Eligibility criteria for SLS I and SLS II were nearly identical. The primary outcome was % predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), and key secondary outcomes included% predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), the modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS), and dyspnea. Joint models were created to evaluate the treatment effect on the course of these outcomes over 2 years. Results. At baseline, the MMF-treated group in SLS II (n=69) and the placebo-treated group in SLS I (n=79) had similar percentages of men and women and similar disease duration, SSc subtype, extent of skin disease, and % predicted FVC. MMF-treated patients in SLS II were slightly older (mean+/-SD age 52.6+/-9.7 years versus 48.1+/-12.4 years; P=0.0152) and had higher % predicted DLCO (mean+/-SD 54.0611.1 versus 46.2+/-13.3; P=0.0002) than placebo-treated patients in SLS I. After adjustment for baseline disease severity, treatment with MMF in comparison with placebo was associated with improved % predicted FVC (P<0.0001), % predicted DLCO (P<0.0001), MRSS (P<0.0001), and dyspnea (P=0.0112) over 2 years. Conclusion. Although there are inherent limitations in comparing participants from different trials, treatment with MMF was associated with improvements in physiologic outcomes and dyspnea compared with placebo, even after accounting for baseline disease severity. These results further substantiate the use of MMF for the treatment of SSc-related ILD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据