4.5 Article

Tailoring Differential Moisture Transfer Performance of Nonwoven/Polyacrylonitrile-SiO2 Nanofiber Composite Membranes

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 4, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201700062

关键词

differential moisture transport; electrospinning; moisture management testing; nanofibers; nonwoven

资金

  1. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [16QA1400200]
  2. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning [TP2016019]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0303201, 2016YFB0303203]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51503028, 51322304]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid moisture (sweat) transport properties of textile materials play critical role in maintaining the comfort of body which are mainly controlled by surface chemistry, structure, and morphology of substrate. Herein, a dual layer surface treated nonwoven (NW)/electrospun nanofiber membrane with excellent differential liquid moisture transport characteristics is reported. NW is used as inner layer for its high moisture releasing and low moisture absorbing features, and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) as outer layer because of its decent hydrophilic nature. Wettability of NW is tailored by surface treatment with polydopamine, and the wicking characteristics of PAN nanofibers are enhanced by inducing hydrophilic SiO2 nanoparticles (PAN-SiO2). Performance of resultant surface treated NW (TNW)/PAN-SiO2 nanofiber composite membranes is thoroughly characterized by moisture management tester (MMT). Subsequent composite membranes offer high wettability gradient which leads to their marvelous MMT performance with an outstanding one-way transport capacity of 1413%, excellent overall moisture management capacity of 0.99, and a decent water vapor transfer rate of 12.73 kg m(-2) d(-1), indicating a potential candidate for faster sweat release applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据