4.5 Article

2D-Layered Carbon/TiO2 Hybrids Derived from Ti3C2 MXenes for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution under Visible Light Irradiation

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 4, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201700577

关键词

2D-layered carbon/TiO2; charge transfer; CO2 oxidation; MXenes; photocatalytic activity

资金

  1. Shaanxi Province Foundation for Fundamental Research [2014JQ6229]
  2. Northwestern Polytechnical University (NPU) Foundation for Fundamental Research [NPU96-QZ-2014, 3102014JCQ01031, 3102015ZY086]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51302220]
  4. Science and Technology Committee of Shaanxi Province [2014KW09-03, 2011KGXX47]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing in NWPU [SKLSP201613]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TiO2 is a promising photocatalytic material for hydrogen generation. However, the fast recombination of electron-holes restricts the photocatalytic performance of TiO2. Herein, this study demonstrates a 2D-layered carbon/TiO2 (C/TiO2) architecture via CO2 oxidation of 2D-Ti3C2, in which the 2D carbon layers provide electron transport channels and improve the hole-electron separation efficiency. Compared to Ti3C2 support, the thickness of derived carbon supports is significantly reduced, which enhances the light intensity arriving at the surface of TiO2. The oxidation parameters are investigated systematically. It is found that high temperature and high CO2 gas flux lead to the formation of crystal TiO2 and the oxidation of carbon layers. The bandgap of 2D-layered C/TiO2 samples is ranged from 2.83 to 2.89 eV. The 2D-layered C/TiO2 delivers enhanced photocatalytic activity compared with pure TiO2 catalysts. The optimal photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rate of 2D-layered C/TiO2 is up to 24.04 mu mol h(-1), which is about 89 times higher than that of pure TiO2. This research broadens the applications of C/TiO2 hybrids and provides new approach to synthesize novel 2D-layered materials for photocatalytic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据