4.6 Article

Light Emission Mechanisms in CuInS2 Quantum Dots Evaluated by Spectral Electrochemistry

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 4, 期 10, 页码 2425-2435

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00560

关键词

quantum dot; CuInS2; defect photoluminescence; electron trapping; hole trapping; spectral electrochemistry

资金

  1. Center for Advanced Solar Photophysics (CASP), an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences
  2. Chemical Sciences, Biosciences and Geosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Luminescent CuInS2 (CIS) quantum dots (QDs) exhibit highly efficient intragap emission and long, hundreds-of nanoseconds radiative lifetimes. These spectral properties, distinct from structurally similar II-VI QDs, can be explained by the involvement of intragap defect states containing a localized hole capable of coupling with a conduction band electron for a radiative transition. However, the absolute energies of the intragap and band-edge states, the structure of the emissive defect(s), and the role and origin of nonemissive decay channels still remain poorly understood. Here, we address these questions by applying methods of spectral electrochemistry. Cyclic voltammetry measurements reveal a well-defined intragap state whose redox potential is close to that of the Cu-x defect state (where x = 1+ or 2+). The energy offset of this state from the valence band accounts well for the apparent photoluminescence Stokes shift observed in optical spectra. These results provide direct evidence that Cu-related defects serve as emission centers responsible for strong intragap emission from CIS QDs. We then use in situ spectroelectrochemistry to reveal two distinct emission pathways based on the differing oxidation states of Cu defects, which can be controlled by altering QD stoichiometry (1+ for stoichiometric QDs and 2+ for Cu-deficient QDs).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据