3.9 Article

Omega-3 and alpha-tocopherol provide more protection against contaminants in novel feeds for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) than omega-6 and gamma tocopherol

期刊

TOXICOLOGY REPORTS
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 211-224

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.01.008

关键词

Interactions; Nutrients; PAH; Pesticides; Lipidomics; Metabolomics; RT-qPCR transcriptomics

资金

  1. Advantage West Midlands (AWM)
  2. Norwegian Research Council (NRC) [200506]
  3. NIFES, Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extended use of plant ingredients in Atlantic salmon farming has increased the need for knowledge on the effects of new nutrients and contaminants in plant based feeds on fish health and nutrient contaminant interactions. Primary Atlantic salmon hepatocytes were exposed to a mixture of PAHs and pesticides alone or in combination with the nutrients ARA, EPA, ce.-tocopherol, and-y-tocopherol according to a factorial design. Cells were screened for effects using xCELLigence cytotoxicity screening, NMR spectroscopy metabolomics, mass spectrometry lipidomics and RT-qPCR transcriptomics. The cytotoxicity results suggest that adverse effects of the contaminants can be counteracted by the nutrients. The lipidomics suggested effects on cell membrane stability and vitamin D metabolism after contaminant and fatty acid exposure. Co-exposure of the contaminants with EPA or ce.-tocopherol contributed to an antagonistic effect in exposed cells, with reduced effects on the VTG and FABP4 transcripts. ARA and -y-tocopherol strengthened the contaminant-induced response, ARA by contributing to an additive and synergistic induction of CYPIA, CYP3A and CPT2, and-y-tocopherol by synergistically increasing ACOX1. Individually EPA and ce.-tocopherol seemed more beneficial than ARA and-y-tocopherol in preventing the adverse effects induced by the contaminant mixture, though a combination of all nutrients showed the greatest ameliorating effect. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据