4.6 Review

Monitoring and Optimization of the Process of Drying Fruits and Vegetables Using Computer Vision: A Review

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su9112009

关键词

non-destructive technique; visible-near infrared spectroscopy (Vis-NIR); chemometrics; hyper-; multi-spectral imaging spectroscopy; drying process optimization; quality changes during drying

资金

  1. CORE Organic Plus consortium (Coordination of European Transnational Research in Organic Food and Farming System, European Research Area Net, ERA-NET action) [2814OE006]
  2. Mipaaf (Ministero delle politiche agricole alimentari e forestali-Italy) [2814OE006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An overview is given regarding the most recent use of non-destructive techniques during drying used to monitor quality changes in fruits and vegetables. Quality changes were commonly investigated in order to improve the sensory properties (i.e., appearance, texture, flavor and aroma), nutritive values, chemical constituents and mechanical properties of drying products. The application of single-point spectroscopy coupled with drying was discussed by virtue of its potentiality to improve the overall efficiency of the process. With a similar purpose, the implementation of a machine vision (MV) system used to inspect foods during drying was investigated; MV, indeed, can easily monitor physical changes (e.g., color, size, texture and shape) in fruits and vegetables during the drying process. Hyperspectral imaging spectroscopy is a sophisticated technology since it is able to combine the advantages of spectroscopy and machine vision. As a consequence, its application to drying of fruits and vegetables was reviewed. Finally, attention was focused on the implementation of sensors in an on-line process based on the technologies mentioned above. This is a necessary step in order to turn the conventional dryer into a smart dryer, which is a more sustainable way to produce high quality dried fruits and vegetables.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据