4.6 Review

The Value Landscape in Ecosystem Services: Value, Value Wherefore Art Thou Value?

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su9050850

关键词

environmental economics; ecological economics; ecosystem services valuation; monetary; non-monetary; uncertainty; discounting; social and shared values

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC, UK)
  2. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC, UK) [ES/I003851/1]
  3. ESRC [ES/N012550/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/N012550/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecosystem services has risen to become one of the preeminent global policy discourses framing the way we conceive and articulate environment-society relations, integral to the form and function of a number of far-reaching international policies such as the Aichi 2020 Biodiversity Targets and the recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals. Value; its pursuit, definition, quantification, monetization, multiplicity and uncertainty, both in terms of meaning and attribution, is fundamental to the economic foundations of ecosystem services and a core feature driving its inclusion across multiple policy domains such as environmental management and conservation. Distilling current knowledge and developments in this arena are thus highly prescient. In this article, we cast a critical eye over the evidence base and aim to provide a comprehensive synthesis of what values are, why they are important and the methodological approaches employed to elicit them (including their pros and cons and the arguments for and against). We also illustrate the current ecosystem service value landscape, highlight some of the fundamental challenges in discerning and applying values, and outline future research activities. In so doing, we further advance ecosystem valuation discourse, contribute to wider debates linking ecosystem services and sustainability and strengthen connections between ecosystem services and environmental policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据