4.5 Article

Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviates harmful effects of drought stress on damask rose

期刊

SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 1772-1780

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.015

关键词

AMF; Gas exchange; Glomus; Pigments content; Rosa damascena Mill; Drought stress

类别

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia [RGP-1438-053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was conducted to examine the role of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) in alleviating the adverse effects of drought stress on damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) plants. Four levels of drought stress (100, 75, 50, and 25% FC) were examined on mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants in pots filled with sterilized soil. Our results showed that increasing drought stress level decreased all growth parameters, nutrient contents, gas exchange parameters, and water relations indicators. Under different levels of drought stress, mycorrhizal colonization significantly increased all studied parameters. P-n, g(s), and E of the mycorrhizal plants was higher than those of non-mycorrhizal plants under different levels of drought stress. The increase in those rates was proportional the level of the mycorrhizal colonization in the roots of these plants. Majority of growth, nutrition, water status and photosynthetic parameters had a great dependency on the mycorrhizal colonization under all levels of drought stress. The results obtained in this study provide a clear evidence that AMF colonization can enhance growth, flower quality and adaptation of rose plants under different drought stress levels, particularly at high level of drought stress via improving their water relations and photosynthetic status. It could be concluded that colonization with AMF could help plants to tolerate the harmful effects caused by drought stress in arid and semi-arid regions. (C) 2017 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据