4.5 Article

Extreme effects of Seabuckthorn extracts on influenza viruses and human cancer cells and correlation between flavonol glycosides and biological activities of extracts

期刊

SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 1646-1656

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.01.004

关键词

Seabuckthorn leaf; Influenza; Cancer; SRB assay; Metabolite correlation

类别

资金

  1. KU Research Professor Program of Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seabuckthorn is a medicinal plant that is used to prevent cold. It was tested for its metabolic content followed by activity against cancer and virus. The metabolic distribution of different polarity solvent extractions from the leaves was analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Flavonol glycoside contents in EA and Bu extracts were higher than MeOH andDWwas observed. MeOH and EA extracts recorded high activity against influenza A/PR virus with IC50 of 7.2 mu g/mL and 10.3 mu g/mL compared with known drug Oseltamivir of 60.3 mu g/mL. A similar trend showed in influenza A/Victoria virus. In case of influenza B viruses such as B/Lee and B/Maryland, EA extract (2.87 mu g/mL and 4.5 mu g/mL of IC50) emerged strongest among other extracts and Oseltamivir (103.73 mu g/mL and 71.6 mu g/mL). Each extract showed potent anticancer activities. Interestingly, Bu extract showed stronger anticancer activity against human cancer cells such as NCL-H1299, HeLa, SKOV and Caski (8.2 mu g/mL, 8.6 lg/mL, 18.2 mu g/mL and 9.2 mu g/mL of IC50) respectively. Correlation study reveals that aglycones and flavonol mono-glycosides highly correlated with anti-influenza activities but not correlated with anticancer activities. Reversely, di-glycosides and tri-glycosides have a high correlation with cytotoxic effect with both normal and cancer cells. Therefore, this study provides significant information concerning Seabuckthorn for further medicinal drug development. (C) 2016 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据