4.8 Article

Advanced anode for sodium-ion battery with promising long cycling stability achieved by tuning phosphorus-carbon nanostructures

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 40, 期 -, 页码 550-558

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.019

关键词

Phosphorus; Anode; Sodium-ion battery; Porous carbon; Carbon nanotube

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-1610430]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602250]
  3. Thousand Youth Talents Plan Project of China
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1610430] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphorus is considered as a promising anode for Na-ion battery because of its high theoretical capacity of 2595 mAh g(-1). In this study, two phosphorus-carbon (P-C) composites with well-controlled compositions and nanostructures of P and C have been developed: P@YP composite with P confined within porous structure of YP-80F carbon and P@CNT with unconfined P deposited on the surface of carbon nanotube. The structure and electrochemical performance of these two composites have been studied to illustrate the effect of nanostructures of both C and P. P@YP composite with appropriate amount of P confined in nanopores can accommodate its large volume change upon sodiation/desodiation and enable a stable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI), ensuring an excellent long-term cycling stability with superior capacity retention of 92% after 100 cycles and 46% after 1000 cycles. In contrast, the P@CNT composite with unconfined P nanostructures shows a rapid capacity decay with capacity retention of similar to 40.6% after 100 cycles, most likely due to unstable SEI during cycling, caused by the large volume changes of unconfined P in the P@CNT composite. The well-designed nanostructured P-C composite with P confined within porous structure of carbon is demonstrated to greatly enhance the electrochemical performance, leading to promising long-term cycling stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据