4.8 Article

S-NiFe2O4 ultra-small nanoparticle built nanosheets for efficient water splitting in alkaline and neutral pH

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 40, 期 -, 页码 264-273

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.031

关键词

Ultra-small nanoparticle; S-doped NiFe2O4 nanosheet; Electrocatalysis; Water splitting

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP140104062, DP160104866, DP170104464, LP160100927]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient electrocatalyst is essential to develop water splitting technology for large-scale hydrogen production, especially using bifunctional earth-abundant alternative catalysts under alkaline and neutral conditions. NiFe-based oxides have promising activity towards the oxygen evolution (OER). However, they usually show unsatisfactory performance for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), due to their large particle size with limited active sites and poor conductivity. Herein, we report the synthesis of sulfur-incorporated NiFe2O4 nanosheets on nickel foam (S-NiFe2O4/NF), composed of ultra-small nanoparticles (similar to 2 nm), by a facile confined growth strategy with the assistance of thiourea. Due to the favorable 3D hierarchical structure, the self-supported electrocatalyst endows abundant active sites, high electrical conductivity and rapid mass transfer, thereby achieving remarkable catalytic performance for overall water splitting under alkaline and neutral conditions. Specifically, the optimal S-NiFe2O4/NF electrode requires only 1.65 and 1.95 V to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) in 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS, respectively, outperforming that of the commercial Pt/C as well as its counterparts (i.e. S-NiO/NF, S-Fe3O4/NF and pure NiFe2O4/NF). In addition, the synthesis strategy developed here can be applied to other mixed transition metal oxides with similar morphology and structure for various applications, such as supercapacitors, metal-air batteries, and photocatalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据