4.8 Article

A universal approach to improve electron mobility without significant enlarging phase separation in IDT-based non-fullerene acceptor organic solar cells

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 609-617

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.014

关键词

Non-fullerene organic solar cells; Mobility; Crystallinity; Phase separation; Thick-film devices; Morphology

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2016YFA0200700]
  2. NSFC [21504066, 21534003]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences [201629]
  4. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in-situ solvent annealing method of solvent annealing during spin-coating (SC-SVA) was deployed to increase the electron mobility by improving the crystallinity of non-fullerene acceptor without significant enlarging the domain size. Although similar effect can be achieved by the post solvent annealing and co-solvents methods, these methods meanwhile enlarge the phase separation in the PTB7-Th: ITIC based organic solar cells. Thus, the efficiency of SC-SVA based device results in a 20% enhancement and exhibits a better photovoltaic performance than that of the post solvent annealing and co-solvents methods. The fundamental mechanism of these three methods were analyzed and discussed in detail. As the enhanced crystallinity of non-fullerene acceptor could improve charge carrier mobility, the thick-film devices with SC-SVA were fabricated and exhibit great photovoltaic performance. Moreover, this beneficial SC-SVA method was successfully employed in the other IDT-based PTB7-Th:ITIC-Th and PTB7-Th:IEIC devices as well as in the PTZ1:IDIC binary and PTZ1: IDIC:ITIC ternary devices. The high efficiencies of 10.11% and 10.30% were achieved for the binary and ternary devices with SC-SVA, respectively, showing its excellent universality and prospect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据