4.8 Article

A low-cost photoelectrochemical tandem cell for highly-stable and efficient solar water splitting

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 225-232

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.032

关键词

Photoelectrochemical tandem cell; Water splitting; WO3/TiO2 photoanode; Double-match; MoS2

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576162, 51578332, 21507085]
  2. Shanghai Yangfan Program [14YF1401500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stability and cost of solar-driven water splitting system are still the main bottlenecks for its large-scale implementation. Here, an ingeniously designed low-cost photoelectrochemical tandem cell possessing three performance-superior components, i.e., a front novel photoanode of WO3 nanoplates epitaxially coated with [001]-oriented TiO2 nanoprickles, and a rear Si photovoltaic cell, and a counter-cathode of interlayer-expanded MoS2 nanostructures, is reported for highly-stable and efficient solar water splitting. The tandem cell shows a close-to-unity Coulomb efficiency for water splitting, and a high and sustained-stable solar-to-hydrogen efficiency in a 35 days' test. The result also reveals that it is versatile in solar-driven wastewater treatment. Most importantly, the composite photoanode that, for the first time, is proposed using epitaxial-growth based on double-match, i.e. lattice match and band match, shows dramatical improvement in stability and photoelectrochemical performance, in which the photocurrent of the WO3/TiO2 photoanode is improved by 80% without any obvious decay after 100 h of continuous testing compared with a 92% decay in photocurrent for the WO3 photoanode. The epitaxial TiO2 layer facilitates interfacial charge transportations and provides a complete sealing of WO3 surfaces at an atomic level. Such efficient interfacial design and system-level integration of high-performance nanomaterials shed a unique light on the potential large-scale implementation of solar water splitting for renewable hydrogen fuel production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据