4.8 Article

Comparing the device physics, dynamics and morphology of polymer solar cells employing conventional PCBM and non-fullerene polymer acceptor N2200

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 251-262

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.050

关键词

All-polymer solar cells; Geminate recombination; Energy loss; Morphology; Orientation

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61222401, 61674111]
  3. National Key Research Projects [2016YFA0202402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current all polymer solar cells still suffer from low fill factors (FF) and short-circuit current density (J(sc)) compared with the conventional polymer/fullerene system. Herein in this work, devices using PTP8 as the electron donor and [70]PCBM as well as widely used polymer N2200 as the electron acceptor were systematically studied and compared. The major loss mechanisms in the all polymer solar cells were investigated to understand their relatively lower performance than the PTP8/fullerene system. By performing in-depth analysis on ultrafast transient transmission spectroscopy results, we estimated that in PTP8/N2200 device nearly half of the charges recombine geminately, which is confirmed as the major factor hindering the device performance of all polymer solar cells compared with polymer/fullerene system. Through thorough morphology analysis, the low charge generation efficiency is attributed to the reduced crystallinity of N2200 in the blend film and the unfavorable face-to-edge orientation at the donor/acceptor heterojunction. Coupling these results with knowledge from efficient polymer/fullerene systems, the future design of new polymers can devote to increase the attraction between the pi face of donor and acceptor, leading to enhanced face-to-face orientation at the heterojunction, while maintaining a high pi-pi stacking order for each polymer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据