4.8 Article

In-situ mass-electrochemical study of surface redox potential and interfacial chemical reactions of Li(Na)FePO4 nanocrystals for Li(Na)-ion batteries

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 90-97

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.019

关键词

Lithium ion battery; Surface redox potential; Electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance; Density functional theory; Interfacial structure

资金

  1. Guangdong Innovation Team Project [2013N080]
  2. ShenZhen Pea-cock Plan [KYPT20141016105435850]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Grant [ZDSY20130331145131323, JCYJ201409031 01633318, JCYJ20140903101617271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, an in-situ experimental mass-electrochemical investigation of the LiFePO4 (LFP) and NaFePO4 (NFP) electrolyte interfacial chemical reactions and surface redox potential is achieved by adopting electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM) to monitor the mass change trend. In organic electrolyte, LFP (NFP) cathode's mass decreases/increases during the charge/discharge process because of deintercalation/intercalation of Li (Na) ions, which is an normal phenomenon which is generally known. However, the mass-potential curve for LFP nanocrystals in aqueous electrolyte show an anomalous mass change interval (AMCI) around 3.42 V (vs. Li/Li+) where the cathode's mass increase in the charging process and mass decrease in the discharging process, which doesn't obey the normal law of mass change. Through density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we gain a microscopic picture of the solid-liquid interface structure with a reconstructed LFP (010)/H2O and NFP (010)/H2O interface. Taken together, it's concluded that the surface redox potential of LFP is around 3.31 V, which is lower than the bulk potential (3.42 V) and the desolvation/solvation rate of surficial Li-ion is lower than the bulk Li-ion diffusion rate. While for NFP, it's surface redox potential is almost the same as the bulk one.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据