4.6 Article

Design, Manufacture and Testing of Capacitive Pressure Sensors for Low-Pressure Measurement Ranges

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/mi8020041

关键词

pressure sensor; capacitive sensing; polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS); tunable sensitivity

资金

  1. Heriot-Watt University
  2. University of Edinburgh for a James Watt Research Scholarship
  3. Edinburgh Research Partnership in Engineering (ERPE)
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/K034537/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/K034537/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MC_PC_15027] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K034537/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_15027] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the design, manufacture and testing of a capacitive pressure sensor with a high, tunable performance to low compressive loads (<10 kPa) and a resolution of less than 0.5 kPa. Such a performance is required for the monitoring of treatment efficacy delivered by compression garments to treat or prevent medical conditions such as deep vein thrombosis, leg ulcers, varicose veins or hypertrophic scars. Current commercial sensors used in such medical applications have been found to be either impractical, costly or of insufficient resolution. A microstructured elastomer film of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) blend with a tunable Young's modulus was used as the force-sensing dielectric medium. The resulting 18 mm x 18 mm parallel-plate capacitive pressure sensor was characterised in the range of 0.8 to 6.5 kPa. The microstructuring of the surface morphology of the elastomer film combined with the tuning of the Young's modulus of the PDMS blend is demonstrated to enhance the sensor performance achieving a 0.25 kPa pressure resolution and a 10 pF capacitive change under 6.5 kPa compressive load. The resulting sensor holds good potential for the targeted medical application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据