4.3 Article

Ocean acidification alters the burrowing behaviour, Ca2+/Mg2+-ATPase activity, metabolism, and gene expression of a bivalve species, Sinonovacula constricta

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 575, 期 -, 页码 107-117

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps12224

关键词

Ocean acidification; Burrowing behaviour; Metabolism; Gene expression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31372503, 31672634]
  2. Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Exploration and Preservation of Coastal Bio-resources of Zhejiang [J2015002]
  3. Major Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang [2012C13005]
  4. Open Fund of Key Laboratory for Ecological Environment in Coastal Areas, SOA [201603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the impacts of ocean acidification on fertilization, embryonic development, calcification, immune response, and behaviour have been well studied in a variety of marine organisms, the physiological and molecular mechanism manifesting acidification stress on behavioural response remains poorly understood. Therefore, the impacts of future ocean acidification scenarios (pH at 7.8, 7.6, and 7.4) on the burrowing behaviour, Ca2+/Mg2+-ATPase activity, meta bolism, and expression of energy-producing-related genes of the razor clam Sinonovacula constricta were investigated in the present study. The results showed that elevated CO2 partial pressure (pCO(2)) (pH at 7.6 and 7.4) led to a significant reduction in the digging depth of the razor clam. In addition, exposure to pCO(2)-acidified seawater depressed the metabolism and activity of Ca2+/Mg2+-ATPase, which may partially contribute to the reduced digging depth detected. Furthermore, the expression of energy-producing-related genes was generally induced by exposure to acidified seawater and could be accounted for by an increased energy demand under acidification stress. The results obtained suggest ocean acidification may exert a behavioural impact through altering physiological condition in the razor clam.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据