4.3 Article

Association of foraging Steller sea lions with persistent prey hot spots in southeast Alaska

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 571, 期 -, 页码 233-243

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps12145

关键词

Steller sea lions; Herring; Hot spot persistence; Foraging effort

资金

  1. Auke Bay Laboratories
  2. National Marine Fisheries Service
  3. NOAA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding how air-breathing marine vertebrates find and utilize prey provides insight into their foraging mechanisms and ultimately their population productivity and trends. Utilization depends on their ability to locate areas where productive foraging conditions exist. We quantified the abundance of forage fish in southeast Alaska during acoustic surveys between October and April to improve our understanding of Steller sea lion Eumetopias jubatus foraging behavior. Energy densities (millions kJ km(-2)) of forage fish were orders of magnitude greater between November and February due to the presence of large schools of Pacific herring Clupea pallasi. Herring schools were highly aggregated, although the location of these aggregations shifted southward from November to April. Thus, a productive foraging area in one month did not necessarily equate to a productive area in the next month. However, by surveying on successive days and weeks, we found that herring aggregations persisted at shorter time scales. When the study area was partitioned into 1 x 1 km blocks, the day-to-day abundance of prey within a block was highly correlated with prey abundance the following day (correlation coefficient, r = 0.75, p < 0.001) and with prey abundance for the following week (r = 0.55, p < 0.001). More importantly, the persistence of these prey hot spots was an important characteristic in determining whether foraging sea lions utilized them. The odds of observing a foraging sea lion were about 1 in 3 for locations where prey hot spots were persistent. The persistence of these hot spots allowed predators to predict their locations and concentrate search efforts accordingly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据