4.4 Article

Effect of Selective Inhibition of Reactivated Nicotine-Associated Memories With Propranolol on Nicotine Craving

期刊

JAMA PSYCHIATRY
卷 74, 期 3, 页码 224-232

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3907

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB856400, 2015CB559200, 2015CB553503]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31230033, 91432303, 31300930, 81221002, 81201032]
  3. Ten Thousand Youth Talents
  4. Intramural Research Program of the National Insitutue on Drug Abuse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IMPORTANCE A relapse into nicotine addiction during abstinence often occurs after the reactivation of nicotine reward memories, either by acute exposure to nicotine (a smoking episode) or by smoking-associated conditioned stimuli (CS). Preclinical studies suggest that drug reward memories can undergo memory reconsolidation after being reactivated, during which they can be weakened or erased by pharmacological or behavioral manipulations. However, translational clinical studies using CS-induced memory retrieval-reconsolidation procedures to decrease drug craving reported inconsistent results. OBJECTIVE To develop and test an unconditioned stimulus (UCS)-induced retrieval-reconsolidation procedure to decrease nicotine craving among people who smoke. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A translational rat study and human study in an academic outpatient medical center among 96 male smokers (aged 18-45 years) to determine the association of propranolol administration within the time window of memory reconsolidation (after retrieval of the nicotine-associated memories by nicotine UCS exposure) with relapse to nicotine-conditioned place preference (CPP) and operant nicotine seeking in rats, and measures of preference to nicotine-associated CS and nicotine craving among people who smoke. INTERVENTION The study rats were injected noncontingently with the UCS (nicotine 0.15mg/kg, subcutaneous) in their home cage, and the human study participants administered a dose of propranolol (40mg, per os; Zhongnuo Pharma). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Nicotine CPP and operant nicotine seeking in rats, and preference and craving ratings for newly learned and preexisting real-life nicotine-associated CS among people who smoke. RESULTS Sixty-nine male smokers completed the experiment and were included for statistical analysis: 24 in the group that received placebo plus 1 hour plus UCS, 23 who received propranolol plus 1 hour plus UCS, and 22 who received UCS plus 6 hours plus propranolol. In rat relapse models, propranolol injections administered immediately after nicotine UCS-induced memory retrieval inhibited subsequent nicotine CPP and operant nicotine seeking after short (CPP, d=1.72, 95% CI, 0.63-2.77; operant seeking, d=1.61, 95% CI, 0.59-2.60) or prolonged abstinence (CPP, d=1.46, 95% CI, 0.42-2.47; operant seeking: d=1.69, 95% CI, 0.66-2.69), as well as nicotine priming-induced reinstatement of nicotine CPP (d=1.28, 95% CI, 0.27-2.26) and operant nicotine seeking (d=1.61, 95% CI, 0.59-2.60) after extinction. Among the smokers, oral propranolol administered prior to nicotine UCS-induced memory retrieval decreased subsequent nicotine preference induced by newly learned nicotine CS (CS1, Cohen d=0.61, 95% CI, 0.02-1.19 and CS2, d=0.69, 95% CI, 0.10-1.28, respectively), preexisting nicotine CS (d=0.57, 95% CI, -0.02 to 1.15), and nicotine priming (CS1, d=0.82, 95% CI, 0.22-1.41 and CS2, d=0.78, 95% CI, 0.18-1.37, respectively; preexisting nicotine CS, d=0.92, 95% CI, 0.31-1.52), as well as nicotine craving induced by the preexisting nicotine CS (d=0.64, 95% CI, 0.05-1.22), and nicotine priming (d=1.15, 95% CI, 0.52-1.76). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In rat-to-human translational study, a novel UCS-induced memory retrieval-reconsolidation interference procedure inhibited nicotine craving induced by exposure to diverse nicotine-associated CS and nicotine itself. This procedure should be studied further in clinical trials. Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据