4.4 Article

A Test of the Transdiagnostic Dopamine Hypothesis of Psychosis Using Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging in Bipolar Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia

期刊

JAMA PSYCHIATRY
卷 74, 期 12, 页码 1206-1213

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2943

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC-A656-5QD30]
  2. Maudsley Charity grant [666]
  3. US Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
  4. Wellcome Trust [094849/Z/10/Z]
  5. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust and King's College London
  6. MRC [G0900891, MR/K022733/1, G1100809, MC_U120085814, G0700995, MR/N026063/1, MC_U120097115] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [G1100809, MR/N026063/1, 1116129, MC_U120097115, MR/K022733/1, MC_U120085814, G0900891, G0700995] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2016-17-005, NF-SI-0616-10091] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IMPORTANCE The dopamine hypothesis suggests that dopamine abnormalities underlie psychosis, irrespective of diagnosis, implicating dopamine dysregulation in bipolar affective disorder and schizophrenia, in line with the research domain criteria approach. However, this hypothesis has not been directly examined in individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychosis. OBJECTIVES To test whether dopamine synthesis capacity is elevated in bipolar disorder with psychosis and how this compares with schizophrenia and matched controls and to examine whether dopamine synthesis capacity is associated with psychotic symptom severity, irrespective of diagnostic class. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional case-control positron emission tomographic study was performed in the setting of first-episode psychosis services in an inner-city area (London, England). Sixty individuals participated in the study (22 with bipolar psychosis [18 antipsychotic naive or free], 16 with schizophrenia [14 antipsychotic naive or free], and 22 matched controls) and underwent fluorodihydroxyphenyl-L-alanine ([F-18]-DOPA) positron emission tomography to examine dopamine synthesis capacity. Standardized clinical measures, including the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning, were administered. The study dates were March 2013 to November 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Dopamine synthesis capacity (Ki(cer)) and clinical measures (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning). RESULTS The mean (SD) ages of participants were 23.6 (3.6) years in 22 individuals with bipolar psychosis (13 male), 26.3 (4.4) years in 16 individuals with schizophrenia (14 male), and 24.5 (4.5) years in controls (14 male). There was a significant group difference in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity (Ki(cer)) (F2,57 = 6.80, P =.002). Ki(cer) was significantly elevated in both the bipolar group (mean [SD], 13.18 [1.08] x 10(-3) min(-1); P =.002) and the schizophrenia group (mean [SD], 12.94 [0.79] x 10-3 min-1; P =.04) compared with controls (mean [SD], 12.16 [0.92] x 10(-3) min(-1)). There was no significant difference in striatal Ki(cer) between the bipolar and schizophrenia groups. Ki(cer) was significantly positively correlated with positive psychotic symptom severity in the combined bipolar and schizophrenia sample experiencing a current psychotic episode, explaining 27% of the variance in symptom severity (n = 32, r = 0.52, P =.003). There was a significant positive association between Ki(cer) and positive psychotic symptom severity in individuals with bipolar disorder experiencing a current psychotic episode (n = 16, r = 0.60, P =.01), which remained significant after adjusting for manic symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings are consistent with a transdiagnostic role for dopamine dysfunction in the pathoetiology of psychosis and suggest dopamine synthesis capacity as a potential novel drug target for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据