4.4 Article

Heterogeneity and Homogeneity of Regional Brain Structure in Schizophrenia A Meta-analysis

期刊

JAMA PSYCHIATRY
卷 74, 期 11, 页码 1104-1111

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2663

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council-United Kingdom [MC-A656-5QD3O]
  2. Maudsley Charity, Brain and Behavior Research Foundation [666]
  3. Wellcome Trust [094849/Z/10/Z]
  4. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at South London
  5. Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust
  6. King's College London
  7. MRC [G0700995, MC_U120097115] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [1116129, MC_U120097115, G0700995] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2016-18-005] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IMPORTANCE: Schizophrenia is associated with alterations in mean regional brain volumes. However, it is not known whether the clinical heterogeneity seen in the disorder is reflected at the neurobiological level, for example, in differences in the interindividual variability of these brain volumes relative to control individuals. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether patients with first-episode schizophrenia exhibit greater variability of regional brain volumes in addition to mean volume differences. DATA SOURCES: Studies that reported regional brain volumetric measures in patients and controls by using magnetic resonance imaging in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases from inception to October 1, 2016, were examined. STUDY SELECTION: Case-control studies that reported regional brain volumes in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and healthy controls by using magnetic resonance imaging were selected. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Means and variances (SDs) were extracted for each measure to calculate effect sizes, which were combined using multivariate meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Relative variability of regional brain volumetric measurements in patients compared with control groups as indexed by the variability ratio (VR) and coefficient of variation ratio (CVR). Hedges g was used to quantify mean differences. RESULTS: A total of 108 studies that reported measurements from 3901 patients (1272 [32.6%] female) with first-episode schizophrenia and 4040 controls (1613 [39.9%] female) were included in the analyses. Variability of putamen (VR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24; P = .01), temporal lobe (VR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.21; P = .004), thalamus (VR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.26; P < .001), and third ventricle (VR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.20-1.71; P < 1 x 10(-5)) volume was significantly greater in patients, whereas variability of anterior cingulate cortex volume was lower (VR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98; P = .02). These findings were robust to choice of outcome measure. There was no evidence of altered variability of caudate nucleus or frontal lobe volumes. Mean volumes of the lateral (g = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.51; P <.001) and third ventricles (g = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.59; P < .001) were greater, whereas mean volumes of the amygdala (g = -0.46; -0.65 to -0.26; P < .001), anterior cingulate cortex (g = -0.26; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.10; P = .005), frontal lobe (g = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.19; P = .001), hippocampus (g = -0.66; 95% CI, -0.84 to -0.47; P <.001), temporal lobe (g = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.36 to -0.09; P = .001), and thalamus (g = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.57 to -0.15; P = .001) were lower in patients. There was no evidence of altered mean volume of caudate nucleus or putamen. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In addition to altered mean volume of many brain structures, schizophrenia is associated with significantly greater variability of temporal cortex, thalamus, putamen, and third ventricle volumes, consistent with biological heterogeneity in these regions, but lower variability of anterior cingulate cortex volume. This finding indicates greater homogeneity of anterior cingulate volume and, considered with the significantly lower mean volume of this region, suggests that this is a core region affected by the disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据