4.6 Article

Safety and activity of IT-139, a ruthenium-based compound, in patients with advanced solid tumours: a first-in- human, open-label, dose-escalation phase I study with expansion cohort

期刊

ESMO OPEN
卷 1, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000154

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Niiki Pharma
  2. Intezyne Technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective This phase I clinical study (NCT01415297) evaluated the safety, tolerability, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of IT-139 (formerly NKP-1339) monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. IT-139, sodium trans(tetrachlorobis(1H-indazole) ruthenate(III)), is a novel small molecule that suppresses the stress induction of GRP78 in tumour cells. GRP78 is a key regulator of misfolded protein processing, and its upregulation in tumours is associated with intrinsic and drug-induced resistance. Methods Forty-six patients with advanced solid tumours refractory to treatment received intravenous infusions of IT-139 on days 1, 8 and 15 for every 28 days, and doses were evaluated across nine cohorts at 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 420, 500, 625 and 780 mg/m(2). Results Overall, IT-139 was well tolerated. The treatmentemergent adverse events (AEs) occurring in = 20% of patients were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, anaemia and dehydration. The majority of patients had AEs that were = grade 2, regardless of relationship with the study drug. Of the total 38 efficacy-evaluable patients, one patient with a carcinoid tumour achieved a durable partial response. Nine additional patients achieved stable disease. The MTD was determined to be 625 mg/m(2). IT-139 exhibited first-order linear pharmacokinetics. Conclusions IT-139 demonstrated a manageable safety profile at the MTD and modest anti-tumour activity in this study of patients with solid tumours refractory to treatment. The lack of dose-limiting haematological toxicity and the absence of neurotoxicity position IT-139 well for use in combination with a broad spectrum of anticancer drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据