期刊
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 671-674出版社
W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.06.116
关键词
Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Embolization; Endoleak; Endovascular; EVAR; Inferior mesenteric artery
Type II endoleak is a common condition occurring after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR), and may result in aneurysm sac growth and/or rupture in a small number of patients. A prophylactic strategy of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization before EVAR has been advocated, however, the benefits of this strategy are controversial. A clinical vignette allows the authors to summarize the available data about this issue and discuss the possible benefits and risks of prophylactic IMA embolization before EVAR. The authors performed a meta-analysis of available data which showed that the pooled rate of type II endoleak after IMA embolization was 19.9% (95% Cl 3.4-34.7%, I-2 93%) whereas it was 41.4% (95% Cl 30.4-52.3%, I-2 76%) in patients without IMA embolization (5 studies including 596 patients: p < .0001, OR 0.369, 95% Cl 0.22-0.61, I-2 27%). Since treatment for type II endoleaks is needed in less than 20% of cases and this complication can be treated successfully in 60-70% of cases resulting in an aneurysm rupture risk of 0.9%, these data indicate that embolization of patent IMA may be of no benefit in patients undergoing EVAR. (C) 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据