4.6 Article

High-temperature annealing of an iron microplate with excellent microwave absorption performance and its direct micromagnetic analysis by electron holography and Lorentz microscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 5, 期 24, 页码 6047-6053

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7tc01544e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (973 Project) [2013CB932901]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672050, 51172047]
  3. NSFC-NASF [U1330118]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [2016YFE0105700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To meet the demand of electromagnetic interference shielding, cheap and easily available microwave absorbers are urgently required. Recently, most of the related research has been focussed on a number of complicated absorbers comprising multi-components because of their better electromagnetic match. However, it is still a great challenge to develop an absorber that simultaneously possesses the advantages of easy fabrication, low-cost, ultra-wide bandwidth, and strong absorption. Hence, development of a simple and convenient absorber with efficient performance is attracting significant attention because of the urgent requirement of this type of absorbers. Herein, a series of single-component iron-based absorbers with different morphologies and grain sizes was successfully prepared. Strong absorption intensity (similar to -43.4 dB) was found in plate-like samples, which could even match those of some multi-component absorbers. Electron holography and Lorentz microscopy analysis were used for the further comprehension of the relationships among the microstructure, electromagnetic property, and microwave absorption performance. The primary grain size of the present iron microplate was found fundamentally important for microwave absorption performance. This cheap and available absorber is believed to be an optimal choice for single-component absorbers and useful in the research of absorption mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据