4.6 Article

Intrinsic low dielectric constant polyimides: relationship between molecular structure and dielectric properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 5, 期 48, 页码 12807-12815

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7tc04220e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National 973 Program of China [2014CB643605]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51373204, 51173214, 51233008]
  3. National 863 Program of China [2015AA033408]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2015B090915003, 2015B090913003]
  5. Leading Scientific, Technical and Innovation Talents of Guangdong Special Support Program [2016TX03C295]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612801]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [161gzd08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low dielectric organic materials have been studied extensively, however, the relationship and regularity between the molecular structure and the dielectric properties is still not clear and barely reported. In this study, we report the synthesis of three polyimides (PPy6F, mBPPy6F and mTPPy6F) containing the same diphenylpyridine core structure but different side-chains with varied number of benzene rings. The polyimides PPy6F, mBPPy6F and mTPPy6F which contain one, two and three benzene rings in the pendant group, respectively, show intrinsic dielectric constant k values of 2.81 (PPy6F), 2.61 (mBPPy6F) and 2.44 (mTPPy6F). The reason for the reduced k value with increasing number of benzene rings in the pendant group is discussed through the investigation of morphology, density and water absorption properties of these polyimides. This discovery provides us with a new and easy strategy to obtain lower dielectric polymers. Polyimide mTPPy6F shows excellent comprehensive properties, with a high glass transition temperature (T-g) of 342 degrees C, a 5 wt% loss temperature (T-d,T- 5%) of 551 degrees C, tensile strength of 105 MPa, low moisture absorption of only 0.61% and good solubility in common organic solvents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据