4.6 Article

Engineering the excited-state properties of purely organic intramolecular and intermolecular charge transfer emitters towards high-performance fluorescent OLEDs

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 5, 期 42, 页码 10991-11000

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7tc04014h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2016YFB0401004]
  3. 973 Project [2015CB655003]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51625301, 51603071, 51573059, 91233116]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M590775, 2017T100628]
  6. Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2016B090906003, 2016TX03C175]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A direct comparative investigation on the electrofluorescence performances of pure-organic intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) and intermolecular charge transfer (inter-CT) materials, which have high correlation in their molecular structures, was carried out. An n-type spiro-sulfone-based acceptor (DSO2) with a sufficiently large molecular weight is developed to serve as the acceptor in both ICT and inter-CT systems. Through manipulating their excited-state properties by molecular engineering, transformation of conventional fluorescence and thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) from both the inter-CT and ICT systems could be rationally modulated. Accordingly, a conventional fluorescent, non-doped, blue OLED with an external quantum efficiency (EQE) > 6.0% at a luminance of 1000 cd m(-2) and a low turn-on voltage (V-on) of 2.76 V was obtained; maximum EQEs of 18.2% and 25.4% were achieved for the non-doped and doped sky-blue OLEDs employing an ICT emitter with a TADF character, respectively. Besides, an OLED using the inter-CT emitter could also show good device performance with an EQE of up to 10.2%. This study contributes to understanding how to develop high-performance ICT and inter-CT emitters with selective thermally activated delayed and conventional electrofluorescence through excited-state modulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据