4.6 Article

Strong interfacial interaction and enhanced optical absorption in graphene/InAs and MoS2/InAs heterostructures

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 5, 期 36, 页码 9429-9438

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7tc03350h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0701602]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61640405, 11674090, 11674092, 61172039]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Physics
  4. Key Laboratory of New Electric Functional Materials of Guangxi Colleges and Universities [DGN201502, DGN201605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vertical heterostructures of two-dimensional materials have recently emerged as a promising application in designing novel electronic and optoelectronic devices. By using first principles methods, we investigated the electronic and optical properties of two heterostructures, graphene/InAs and MoS2/InAs. The results reveal that the interfacial structure, coupling, and transfer charges are crucial to enhance the electronic properties and optical adsorption of heterostructures. We found obvious electron-hole pair separation and an in-built polarized electric field at the interface in graphene/InAs heterostructures. In particular, the strong interface electronic coupling opens a 15 meV band gap in graphene after the adsorption on an InAs slab substrate. Benefiting from the interfacial coupling and transfer charge, the optical properties of graphene/InAs heterostructures are slightly enhanced compared to those of isolated composites of heterostructures. Remarkably, MoS2/InAs heterostructures were found to have a larger redistribution of charge, a smaller interlayer distance, and a stronger interfacial interaction than graphene/InAs heterostructures. The calculated optical absorption of MoS2/InAs heterostructures shows more significant absorption properties in the visible region than that of graphene/InAs heterostructures. The mechanisms to understand these phenomena are suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据