4.7 Article

Steam gasification of biomass with subsequent syngas adjustment using shift reaction for syngas production: An Aspen Plus model

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 484-492

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.069

关键词

Steam gasification; Syngas adjustment; Biomass feedstocks; Water gas shift; Reverse water gas shift; Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

资金

  1. project Development of Innovative Catalysts for Syngas Adjustment and Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis from Biomass for Integrated and Decentralised Production of Renewable Synthetic Fuels (DICAFIR)
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [BRAZIL.2013.126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simulation model of biomass gasification for syngas production with steam as gasifying agent and subsequent syngas adjustment has been developed using Aspen Plus. The developed model is based on Gibbs free energy minimization applying the restricted equilibrium method. The objective is to study the effect of important parameters such as gasification temperature, steam to biomass ratio and shift reaction temperature on hydrogen concentration, CO concentration, CO conversion, CO2 conversion and H-2/CO ratio in the syngas. Simulations were performed for different biomass feedstocks to predict their syngas composition. The hydrogen and CO concentrations were altered such that the H-2/CO molar ratio in the syngas composition gets adjusted close to a value of 2.15 as required for FT synthesis by the shift reaction. The present model has been validated with experimental data from literature on steam biomass gasification conducted in a research scale fluidized bed gasifier. The product gas obtained from steam gasification of food wastes resulted in a composition with a H-2/CO molar ratio close to 2.15 which can be directly fed to a Fischer-Tropsch synthesis plant whereas remaining feedstocks requires a syngas adjustment either by WGS or RWGS reactions to achieve H-2/CO molar ratio close to 2.15. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据