4.6 Article

Enhancement of photobactericidal activity of chlorin-e6-cellulose nanocrystals by covalent attachment of polymyxin B

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 5, 期 33, 页码 6953-6962

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7tb01274h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Conseil Regional du Limousin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the advances made over the last decade, infections caused by multi-drug resistant bacterial strains are increasingly important societal issues that need to be addressed. New approaches have already been developed in order to overcome this problem. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT) could provide an alternative to fight infectious bacteria. This approach has already inspired the development of innovative materials. Interesting results have been obtained against Gram-positive bacteria, but it also appeared that Gram-negative strains, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were less sensitive to PACT. Enhanced efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria had been previously obtained with photosensitizers bound to antimicrobial peptides. In this work, we designed a photobactericidal organic material, CNCsc6-PMB, consisting of cellulose nanocrystals to which the photosensitizer chlorin-e6 and the antimicrobial polypeptide polymyxin B (PMB) were covalently attached. These modified nanocrystals were characterized by IR spectroscopy, zeta potential measurements and elemental analyses, after which antibacterial assays were carried out. Following light irradiation, CNCsc6-PMB demonstrated efficiency against Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis) by inhibition of bacterial growth. An amplifying effect of chlorin-e6 has been highlighted against these Gram-negative strains, based on membrane weakening and a potential docking effect from the polymyxin moiety. Such results confirmed the importance of using an antimicrobial peptide in order to broaden the spectrum of PACT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据