4.6 Article

Earth-abundant elements doping for robust and stable solar-driven water splitting by FeOOH

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 5, 期 40, 页码 21478-21485

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta07208b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research Program of China [2017YFA0204800, 2016YFA0202403]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21603136, 61674098]
  3. National Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2017JM2007]
  4. Innovative Research Team [IRT_14R33]
  5. 111 Project [B14041]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201602007, GK261001009]
  7. Chinese National 1000-Talent-Plan program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The water oxidation reaction (OER) is the key process used for the generation of H-2, and new catalyst systems are needed to achieve considerable efficiency in the OER. In the present work, beta-FeOOH samples, both bare and doped with earth-abundant elements (Ni and Co), were synthesized and confirmed to be promising semiconductors for solar-driven water oxidation. This is the first time that the direct use of beta-FeOOH samples has been reported in a water splitting system, in which beta-FeOOH has always been used as a co-catalyst. From a combination of DFT calculations and experimental results, (a) beta-FeOOH can play two roles, namely, carrier generation and improving the kinetics of water oxidation, owing to the abundance of surface OH groups; (b) doping with Ni or Co can improve the photocatalytic activity of beta-FeOOH, and this enhancement benefits from the separation of photogenerated carriers; (c) samples doped with Ni or Co give better performance in electrocatalytic water oxidation than bare beta-FeOOH. After being doped with these earth-abundant elements, beta-FeOOH delivered saturated photocurrent densities of 4.71 (for Co) and 2.55 (for Ni) mA cm(-2), which are higher than the value of 0.69 mA cm(-2) recorded for bare b-FeOOH at a low external bias of 1.0 V versus RHE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据