4.6 Article

Microorganism-moulded pomegranate-like Na3V2(PO4)3/C nanocomposite for advanced sodium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 5, 期 20, 页码 9982-9990

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta02165h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China (973 program) [2015CB251100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51572011, 21073233]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JD1602, buctrc201410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Na3V2(PO4)(3) (NVP) with a NASICON crystal structure is a promising cathode material for sodium-ion batteries; however, it has a low rate performance due to its poor electric conductivity. Herein, pomegranate-like NVP/C composites were proposed and prepared via a simple and cost-efficient method using yeast as the mould. Owing to the strong adsorption ability of yeast, high tolerance to extreme conditions and high nitrogen and phosphorus content, a hierarchically structured material composed by NVP particles embedded within a N-/P-doped carbon framework was formed in situ. In the NVP/C composites, the nanoscaled NVP grains coated by carbon, derived from the cytoplasm, and micron-sized carbon capsules, which resulted from the carbonization of the sturdy cell walls, were formed to further accommodate dozens of the carbon-coated NVP grains, resulting in a pomegranate-like architecture. This unique structure and the N-/P-doped carbon framework can provide superior electrochemical kinetics and stability, with efficient electron pathways, and can also buffer volume changes during Na+ insertion/extraction. As a result, the NVP/C composites exhibit a good rate performance (113.9 mA h g(-1) at 10C) and an outstanding long-term cycling stability (capacity retention of around 74.7% after 10 000 cycles). The properties of the pomegranate-like structure moulded by yeast microorganisms are remarkable and the NVP/C composite is believed to be a promising electrode material for sodium-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据