4.6 Article

A binary metal organic framework derived hierarchical hollow Ni3S2/Co9S8/N-doped carbon composite with superior sodium storage performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 5, 期 23, 页码 11781-11787

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta00201g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) through NSF-CBET [1505943, 1336057]
  2. ACS Petroleum Research Fund (PRF) [53560-DNI 10]
  3. DOE STTR through pH Matter LLC [DE-SC0013831]
  4. Ohio Federal Network Research (OFRN) through Center of Excellence
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1336057] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1505943] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0013831] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A binary Ni/Co metal organic framework (Ni-Co-MOF) with a hollow-sphere structure that is decorated with cone-shaped protrusions was prepared via a facile solvothermal reaction. Carbonization and sulfurization of the Ni-Co-MOF produced a Ni3S2/Co9S8/N-doped carbon composite that retained the hierarchical structure. The final composite material presents exceptional electrochemical performance when used as an anode in sodium-ion batteries. A reversible specific capacity of 419.9 mA h g(-1) at a current density of 0.1 A g(-1) was achieved after 100 cycles, with an exceptional capacity retention of 98.6%. Furthermore, superior rate capability was also demonstrated: an average capacity of 323.2 mA h g(-1) at a current density of 2 A g(-1) can be achieved. This exceptional performance can be attributed to the unique nano-architecture derived from the MOF precursor, as the resultant material possesses an ideal profile for an excellent anode material: ultrafine Ni3S2 and Co9S8 particles (similar to 7 nm), a hollow, porous structure, and an ultrathin N-doped carbon coating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据