4.6 Article

Effective Ca-doping in Y1-xCaxBaCo2O5+δ cathode materials for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 5, 期 48, 页码 25641-25651

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta08954f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB934003]
  2. Guangdong Industry-Academy-Research Alliance [2012B091100129]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [U1637202, 51634003]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600041]
  5. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B14003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ca-doping at the Y-site of Y1-xCaxBaCo2O5+delta (YCBC) double perovskites is shown as an effective strategy to develop a highly efficient, stable, lanthanide-free cathode material for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs). The proposed Ca-doping has a beneficial influence on the structural stability, thermal expansion coefficient, electronic and ionic transport, and electrochemical properties of YCBC oxides. The phase stability and durability at evaluated temperature are greatly enhanced by Ca-doping. The thermal expansion coefficients of Y1-xCaxBaCo2O5+delta are calculated to be 18.1-18.7 x 10(-6) K-1. At 800 degrees C, the conductivity is as high as 220 S cm(-1) for the Y0.8Ca0.2BaCo2O5+delta sample. Area specific resistances as low as 0.010, 0.018, 0.032, 0.068 and 0.142 Omega cm(2) at 850, 800, 750, 700 and 650 degrees C, respectively, are delivered by the Y0.8Ca0.2BaCo2O5+delta cathode in a La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2O3-delta electrolyte supported symmetric cell. The maximum power densities of a full cell with the Y0.8Ca0.2BaCo2O5+delta/Ce0.9Gd0.1O2-delta composite cathode are registered to be 1066, 841, 634 and 430 mW cm(-2) at 850, 800, 750 and 700 degrees C, respectively. All the results clearly demonstrate that Ca-doped Y1-xCaxBaCo2O5+delta double perovskites are highly stable and effectively working candidate cathodes for IT-SOFCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据