4.6 Review

Hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis with binary-nonmetal transition metal compounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 5, 期 13, 页码 5995-6012

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta00743d

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC/Hong Kong RGC Research Scheme [N_HKUST610/14]
  2. RGC of Hong Kong [16300915]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1508085QA10]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences [2015265]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project [2015M582021]
  6. Hong Kong Scholars Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growing concern about global warming, environmental pollution and energy security has increased the demand for clean energy resources in place of fossil fuel. Cost-efficient generation of hydrogen from water splitting through electrocatalysis holds tremendous promise for clean energy. Central to electrocatalysis are efficient and robust electrocatalysts composed of earth-abundant elements, which are urgently needed for realizing low-cost and high-performance energy conversion devices. Transition metal compounds (TMCs) are a group of attractive noble-metal-free electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The incorporation of foreign nonmetal atoms into TMCs is a way of controllable disorder engineering and modification of their electronic structure, and thus may realize the synergistic modulations of both activity and conductivity for efficient HER performance. In the last few years, the interest in binary-nonmetal TMCs as an efficient HER electrocatalyst has grown exponentially owing to their fascinating electronic structure and chemical properties. Here, we sum up the recent developments of binary-nonmetal TMCs in HER electrocatalysis from the viewpoint of their tunable physicochemical properties. In addition, we identify major challenges ahead in this area and refine viable strategies and future research directions that will effectively address the said challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据