4.6 Article

More than 10% efficiency and one-week stability of Si photocathodes for water splitting by manipulating the loading of the Pt catalyst and TiO2 protective layer

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 5, 期 35, 页码 18744-18751

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta04986b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672183]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Education Committee of China [15KJA140003, 16KJA140002]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Si has been studied as a photocathode for water splitting; however, its commercial application is hindered by its poor stability and low solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency (h), where the effective loading of catalysts on the Si surface is one of the key factors. Herein, we report that uniform and small Pt nanoparticles (NPs) were successfully prepared on an n(+)p-Si pyramid surface by a cheap electroless deposition method using Pt salt, based on the hydrophilic character of SiO2. A high eta of 10.5% was obtained under 100 mW cm(-2) simulated solar illumination with a Pt loading of only 1 mg cm(-2), due to the fact that the Pt NPs are small enough to avoid the optical loss of Si, are distributed uniformly on the light-trapping pyramid Si surface to ensure a large number of reaction sites for H-2 production, and establish intimate contact with Si to facilitate carrier transfer. Finally, an similar to 15 nm amorphous TiO2 layer covered on the Pt/n(+)p-Si using atomic layer deposition results in a superior stability over more than one week of continuous photoelectrochemical testing, while increasing its eta to a high value of 10.8% due to the improvement of charge transfer from Pt to the electrolyte. Our findings emphasize the importance of the effective loading of the catalyst and protective layer on the Si photocathode, which subsequently makes the photoelectrochemical process both efficient and stable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据