4.6 Article

High oxygen reduction activity on a metal-organic framework derived carbon combined with high degree of graphitization and pyridinic-N dopants

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 789-795

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta08016b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473254, 21401215]
  2. Special Project Fund of Taishan Scholars of Shandong Province [ts201511017]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [15CX02085A, 15CX07004A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-doped porous carbons have been considered as one of the most promising earth-abundant catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) owing to their high activity and excellent stability. Among various types of N-containing groups, pyridinic-N has been identified as the most effective catalytic sites for the ORR, as demonstrated by a recent study. However, the fabrication of porous carbons with a high density of exposed pyridinic-N sites has been rarely reported. In this work, the ORR catalytic properties of a series of pyridinic-N doped porous carbon (PNPC) which was derived by carbonization of a pyridyl-ligand based MOF were investigated. At different carbonization temperatures, this series of carbon exhibits different pyridinic-N contents and different degrees of carbonization. The ORR studies show that the graphitization degree of carbon has a significant impact on ORR catalytic activity besides N-groups. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) reveals that the electron transfer resistance in the ORR decreases significantly with the higher degree of graphitization, which gives rise to a higher ORR activity for these PNPCs. The synergistic effect of the high density of pyridinic-N sites and decreased electron impedance results in remarkably improved ORR activity which is comparable with that of the commercial Pt/C (10 wt%) catalyst. The result of this work could provide some guidance for designing or synthesizing highly efficient ORR catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据